<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog or Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/</link>
	<description>A floating journey of thoughts and images, by Aaron Kim</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Phang And Atomic Blogging Review &#124; How to Blog For Money</title>
		<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin Phang And Atomic Blogging Review &#124; How to Blog For Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog or&#160;Twitter? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog or&nbsp;Twitter? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Li, long time no talk! I miss listening to your stories. I share your habit of revisiting old entries as a time machine of sorts. I blog for myself - not that I have much of a choice, my readership is really low. 

I find dead easy to add pics in Wordpress (I use ScribeFire). Videos are more complicated, as you need to have them in YouTube or a handful of popular sites before adding them to WP. 

Are you in Twitter? If so, let me know of your handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Li, long time no talk! I miss listening to your stories. I share your habit of revisiting old entries as a time machine of sorts. I blog for myself &#8211; not that I have much of a choice, my readership is really low. </p>
<p>I find dead easy to add pics in WordPress (I use ScribeFire). Videos are more complicated, as you need to have them in YouTube or a handful of popular sites before adding them to WP. </p>
<p>Are you in Twitter? If so, let me know of your handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROI 2.0, Part 1: Bean counters vs Innovators - The need for a real exchange of ideas &#171; The bamboo raft</title>
		<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>ROI 2.0, Part 1: Bean counters vs Innovators - The need for a real exchange of ideas &#171; The bamboo raft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>[...] due to its complexity and scope, and it&#8217;s also a dry subject, not as flashy as talking about Twitter or cool beer ads. Nonetheless, blogging is my way of thinking out loud, so I&#8217;ll give it a try [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] due to its complexity and scope, and it&#8217;s also a dry subject, not as flashy as talking about Twitter or cool beer ads. Nonetheless, blogging is my way of thinking out loud, so I&#8217;ll give it a try [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROI 2.0, Part 1: Bean counters vs Innovators - The need for a real exchange of ideas &#171; The bamboo raft</title>
		<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>ROI 2.0, Part 1: Bean counters vs Innovators - The need for a real exchange of ideas &#171; The bamboo raft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] due to its complexity and scope, and it&#8217;s also a dry subject, not as flashy as talking about Twitter or cool beer ads. Nonetheless, blogging is my way of thinking out loud, so I&#8217;ll give it a try [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] due to its complexity and scope, and it&#8217;s also a dry subject, not as flashy as talking about Twitter or cool beer ads. Nonetheless, blogging is my way of thinking out loud, so I&#8217;ll give it a try [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Li</title>
		<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll add.  The choice of blog vs twitter is about who are you doing this for?  Are you writing for yourself? or communicating an idea?  (my case: yes), then blog is the better format, more substance.  But if you are writing to keep your friends/world up to date on what&#039;s happening with your life, then yes twitter is the quick, easy, instant channel.  Each has its own purpose.  I don&#039;t see one replacing the other, but a co-existence like what you are doing yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll add.  The choice of blog vs twitter is about who are you doing this for?  Are you writing for yourself? or communicating an idea?  (my case: yes), then blog is the better format, more substance.  But if you are writing to keep your friends/world up to date on what&#8217;s happening with your life, then yes twitter is the quick, easy, instant channel.  Each has its own purpose.  I don&#8217;t see one replacing the other, but a co-existence like what you are doing yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Li</title>
		<link>http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronkim.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/blog-or-twitter/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>After 4 years of blogging.  There are lots of my blogs that I don&#039;t care to re-read, but some are funny enough, or sentimental enough that have stood the test of time.  I enjoy going back in time and remind myself what I was thinking oh so long ago.  I&#039;d definitely say more of the gems were the shorter ones.  Probably because I was more succinct, direct and blunt in the shorter ones.  Less fluff, less digression.

The problem I have with twitter and its cohorts is the vast amount of information it produces.  It&#039;s harder to go back and pick out and re-enjoy the gems.  I&#039;d think there is a lot more of the mundane stuff (eating apple, picking nose, etc) that are not worth revisiting.

The other thing is I like to have choice.  The choice of writing something long or short, depending on my mood.  I&#039;m not a fan of restriction.

The complaint I have about blogs, mine in particular, is how difficult it is to add photo or video.  It&#039;s a limitation of my software, as well as lack of time to edit media.  I want to one day be able to instantaneously record what I&#039;m seeing and post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 4 years of blogging.  There are lots of my blogs that I don&#8217;t care to re-read, but some are funny enough, or sentimental enough that have stood the test of time.  I enjoy going back in time and remind myself what I was thinking oh so long ago.  I&#8217;d definitely say more of the gems were the shorter ones.  Probably because I was more succinct, direct and blunt in the shorter ones.  Less fluff, less digression.</p>
<p>The problem I have with twitter and its cohorts is the vast amount of information it produces.  It&#8217;s harder to go back and pick out and re-enjoy the gems.  I&#8217;d think there is a lot more of the mundane stuff (eating apple, picking nose, etc) that are not worth revisiting.</p>
<p>The other thing is I like to have choice.  The choice of writing something long or short, depending on my mood.  I&#8217;m not a fan of restriction.</p>
<p>The complaint I have about blogs, mine in particular, is how difficult it is to add photo or video.  It&#8217;s a limitation of my software, as well as lack of time to edit media.  I want to one day be able to instantaneously record what I&#8217;m seeing and post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
